The High Court has declared in one of its decisions that it is against the constitution to extract the mobile phone data of someone without permission.
A bench consisting of Justice Ali Baqir Najafi and Justice Amjad Rafiq gave the benefit of doubt and decided to acquit Rehmatullah.
The accused arrested by the CTD was sentenced to a total of 10 years by the Anti-Terrorism Court. The Lahore High Court in its judgment said that extracting the phone data of the accused without the permission of the magistrate is in violation of Article 13 of the Constitution.
is against We are concerned that taking someone’s personal phone data is not a good practice as it is against privacy rights. The court feels that if the accused is not willing, at least the permission of the magistrate should be sought to take the phone records.
Talk through. Our phones are no less than our homes, every connection we make within the four walls of our home is constitutionally protected. A person looks at books, Google, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, which is not prohibited by law.
As long as a person must keep his information secret in the phone, that information cannot be extracted without his permission or legal instructions. According to the law, if mobile phone data is providing a link to a crime, it can be brought to the notice of the court within 24 hours.
The allegation of distribution of materials by the prosecution is not supported by any evidence. The alleged material recovered from the mobile was not placed before the accused during the statement of any witness. Sees books, Google, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, which is not prohibited by law.
As long as a person must keep his information secret in the phone, that information cannot be extracted without his permission or legal instructions. According to the law, if mobile phone data is providing a link to a crime, it can be brought to the notice of the court within 24 hours.
The allegation of distribution of materials by the prosecution is not supported by any evidence. The alleged material recovered from the mobile was not placed before the accused during the statement of any witness.
Sees books, Google, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, which is not prohibited by law. As long as a person must keep his information secret in the phone, that information cannot be extracted without his permission or legal instructions.
According to the law, if mobile phone data is providing a link to a crime, it can be brought to the notice of the court within 24 hours. The allegation of distribution of materials by the prosecution is not supported by any evidence.
The alleged material recovered from the mobile was not placed before the accused during the statement of any witness. can be prevented. According to the law, if mobile phone data is providing a link to a crime, it can be brought to the notice of the court within 24 hours.
The allegation of distribution of materials by the prosecution is not supported by any evidence. The alleged material recovered from the mobile was not placed before the accused during the statement of any witness. can be prevented.
According to the law, if mobile phone data is providing a link to a crime, it can be brought to the notice of the court within 24 hours.
The allegation of distribution of materials by the prosecution is not supported by any evidence. The alleged material recovered from the mobile was not placed before the accused during the statement of any witness.
