The Chief Justice while talking to Hamid Khan further remarked that other tactics are being tried here instead of arguments, you have also made various requests in the application. Will focus on the plea, the Chief Justice remarked that he will look into the matter later. Meanwhile, petitioner Junaid Razak’s lawyer Salman Akram Raja, opening the arguments, said that the case of my client’s son is in the military courts, the trial can only be conducted by a judge appointed under Article 175 of the FPLE case. The principle of separation of powers was not clear when the decision was made. Justice Ayesha Malik inquired what is the relationship of this case with FPLE. I will go to the question of my first day, to whom does section 2D of the Army Act apply? Justice Muneeb Akhtar inquired whether officers of the armed forces cannot also be court-martialled in military courts. Salman Akram Raja said that in the United Kingdom and the United States, under certain circumstances, military officers are tried in military courts. Justice Ayesha Malik remarked that the FPLE case was about the trial of retired army officers. Justice Muneeb Akhtar asked if you are saying that even an army officer cannot be tried in military courts or court martialed. Salman Akram Raja said that if my constitutional rights are not affected by the trial in a court, then the case can be conducted in a special court, constitutional rights are not affected in special courts like Banking Court or ATC. The Chief Justice inquired. Has anyone’s trial just started? Salman Akram Raja replied that no one’s trial has started yet. The Chief Justice remarked that you should not talk about assumptions that if there is a trial, it will happen like this, tomorrow the trial of military officers will also be discussed, we have the last working day tomorrow, let’s talk about it. inquired How are you connecting clause 3 of article 175 with fundamental human rights, it will be applied to military courts as well, what is the relation of clause 3 of article 175 here? Salman Akram Raja replied that clause 3 of article 175 Guarantees of fair trial are given effect by Articles 9 and 10, no person can be deprived of the right to a fair trial. Attached, there is a clock called grand complication, you should not create grand complication, you should keep your arguments short and only related to the case. Justice Ayesha Malik remarked that in the FBLE case, the relationship of retired soldiers within the army. , which is inconsistent with this, was the case of whether civilians could be tried in military courts or not. You are challenging the provisions of the Army Act but not giving the reasons. Salman Akram Raja replied that the Supreme Court in a case
