The Q-League has formally requested the dismissal of petitions challenging the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Act in Islamabad. In their plea, the Q-League argues that the legislation established by the parliament is in alignment with the constitution and does not encroach upon the authority of the judiciary. This law, they assert, shares the authority of the Chief Justice of Pakistan with two senior judges and does not diminish the judiciary’s powers. Therefore, they contend that the petitions opposing this practice and procedural law should be rejected.
The essence of their application rests on the belief that by regulating the powers of the Chief Justice of Pakistan, greater transparency can be introduced into judicial affairs. Historical instances have demonstrated that concentrating authority in the hands of a single individual can lead to issues. Involving two senior judges in the decision-making process of the Chief Justice of Pakistan is seen as a means to enhance public trust in the judiciary.
The Q-League also cites the precedent set by the Supreme Court in the Mustafa Impact case to support their argument. This case established that Prime Minister Fard Wahid is not the sole decision-maker, and previous situations, such as those involving Kidney and Liver Hospital and Nasla Tower, were adversely affected by the automatic exercise of notice powers.
